|
Competitive advantages of Value
Quotient (VQ)
How VQ approach is
different from the Kaplan/Norton methodology
The February 2004 issue of Harvard Business Review
includes an article by Robert S. Kaplan and David P.
Norton entitled Measuring the Strategic Readiness of
Intangible Assets. In this article, Kaplan/Norton argue
that measuring the value of a firm's intangible assets
- such as a customer database or people with specific
skills - is about estimating how closely aligned these
intangible assets are with the company's strategy. The
authors present a tool, the strategy map, that they
suggest can link these intangible assets to shareholder
value creation.
Kaplan/Norton's strategy map purports to help managers
measure the strategic readiness of their intangible
assets. The authors suggest that their strategy map
can help managers assess how well their company's people,
systems, and culture fit with changes in strategic direction.
Kaplan/Norton recommend that managers identify the job
families needed to implement a strategy shift and offer
a way to measure how well the firm's job families match
the needs of the strategy. They propose similar techniques
for assessing their firm's systems and culture.
The VQ approach measures how well a company's actions
embody Value Leadership. Value Leadership is the concept
that companies that outperform competitors in building
and sustaining relationships with employees, customers,
and communities earn better returns for their shareholders.
Value Leadership is supported by seven principles:
- Valuing human relationships,
- Fostering teamwork,
- Experimenting frugally,
- Fulfilling your commitments,
- Fighting complacency,
- Winning through multiple means, and
- Giving to your community.
Screening 1,500 companies based on 11 criteria, analysis
suggests that Value Leadership pays. This analysis selected
eight Value Leaders -- Synopsys, WalMart, Goldman Sachs,
MBNA, Johnson & Johnson, J. M. Smucker, Southwest
Airlines, and Microsoft - which offer a rich source
of examples of Value Leadership in action. Through two
recessions, these companies grew 35% faster, were 109%
more profitable, and generated five times more shareholder
wealth than their peers
The VQ, which is tightly linked to this superior performance,
can help executives measure how well they follow the
24 specific activities underlying these seven principles
and learn from the Value Leaders' best practices.
By creating a measurement system that links values,
people, activities, competitive advantage, and financial
performance, the VQ helps companies directly link corporate
values with everyday business practices -- developing
a company-wide discipline that goes beyond 'talking
the talk' to actually 'walking the walk.'
Benefits
Applying the VQ offers the following benefits:
- Objective analysis of the organization's strengths
and opportunities for improvement vis-à-vis practices
of top performing companies -- Value Leaders;
- Short-term opportunities likely to boost financial
performance relatively quickly;
- Medium-term opportunities likely to enhance the firm's
competitive position and longer term earnings power;
and
- Long-term employee orientation shift toward value-based
performance goals.
Process
The six to eight week Value Leadership Assessment (Phase
One) follows five steps:
- Form team. Establish a senior management Steering
Committee and project team and set project objectives,
deliverables and schedule;
- Gather data. Identify and interview roughly 100 stakeholders
including executives, employees, customers, shareholders,
and others;
- Perform analysis. Determine the firm's VQ by comparing
interview results with best practices in the Value Leadership
Database;
- Draw conclusions. Highlight strengths and opportunities
for improvement; and
- Present results. Deliver final results to the Steering
Committee.
The Value Leadership Change Process (Phase Two) generally
takes six to eighteen months to:
- Create a value building business process. Develop
a plan based on the results from Phase One to infuse
value building as a central business goal;
- Measure Value Building. Use the VQ from Phase One
to track value building.
Competitive advantages of VQ over
the scorecards
Managers should evaluate these tools by answering three
questions:
- Which tool is most rigorously linked to financial
performance and shareholder value?
- Which tool is most comprehensive and objective?
- Which tool can generate usable results most quickly?
The VQ has significant competitive advantages from
the perspective of managers, as summarized below.
|
Table 1. Competitive Advantages of VQ over Scorecards |
|---|
| | VQ | Scorecards |
| Link to financial
performance and shareholder value |
Superior. Uses analytical
techniques developed by a globally respected investment
analyst, the VQ is tightly correlated with superior
10-year shareholder returns and other key financial
metrics |
There is no evidence
presented that companies using scorecards generate better
financial performance or superior shareholder returns |
| Comprehensive and
objective |
Superior. Presents mutually
exclusive and collectively exhaustive principles.
VQ scores companies on 24 activities using objective
data benchmarked against best practices of top performing
firms |
Lacks coverage of critical areas including experimenting
frugally, fulfilling commitments, winning through multiple
means, fighting complacency, and giving to the community |
| Generates useful
results quickly |
Superior. Value Leadership
Assessment employs proven process to identify improvement
opportunities most likely to enhance client's financial
results |
Strategy maps and scoring generate vague results
whose scoring appears to be based on self-assessment
that is less likely to be objective |
Peter S. Cohan & Associates
Two Turner Ridge Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
Office: 508-460-9348
Cell: 508-361-3805
Fax: 508-485-9627
e-mail: peter@petercohan.com
http://petercohan.com
|